Feminism now – A Q&A with Lisa Appignanesi and Amy Annette

Categories: Author post

Here at Virago we’re always asking questions. This month we were lucky enough to be joined by two brilliant feminist thinkers, who agreed to answer some for us.

Here’s what happened when two generations of feminism questioned one another – the meeting of two of the minds behind Fifty Shades of Feminism and I Call Myself a Feminist.


Feminist Q&A


When a ‘millennial’ young woman calls herself a feminist now, do you feel she is aligning herself to feminism as you see it?      

Lisa: Feminism for me has always been a plural term. I have never thought of in the singular – except in the very broadest of senses, such as that in my favourite quip: ‘Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.’ Nor am I fond of prescriptive admonitions.

Given all that, I am very happy with the recent efflorescence of feminism amongst young women. I love to learn from the experience of the millennials and indeed argue with them. We don’t have always to agree about directions or positions.  Then, too, where the spectrum of everyday sexism is concerned, not all that much has changed. The only thing I would urge is that this current wave of feminism in all its variety is not allowed to subside too easily, in the way that so many previous waves have.

Amy, what about when a second generation woman calls herself a feminist? Where do you think the differences occur?

Amy:  I can readily imagine that ‘older’ feminists get annoyed when they feel like newer ‘waves’ of feminists seek to define feminism again – I know from doing some panels at literary festivals that some people feel like younger feminists are re-writing a first chapter to a book that has already been long published. But I wonder if defining for yourself what feminism is shouldn’t be something constantly changing. Maybe the first chapter is staying the same but the introduction needs refreshing every now and again.

I know that for a long time violence against women wasn’t an agenda point on ‘to change’ lists simply because it was so widespread and silently known to be a truth for women that people couldn’t contextualise it. They couldn’t see it to define it as a problem to be fixed. I think defining is powerful and ongoing and so we are all engaging with the same material even if some of us came to it later.

I don’t feel an ownership over feminism that allows me to tell people whether or not they are doing it right. I feel an ownership over my own moral compass which tells me I don’t think, for example, that people who exclude Transpeople from their own feminism are correct or aligning themselves to my own version of feminism.


What would you say to your younger or older self, to guide them along feminist lines?

Lisa: Thinking about what I’d say to my younger self is not altogether easy since that woman with all her hopes and innocence in place isn’t all that easy to conjure up again. When experience talks to innocence in this domain, it usually takes the form: – why didn’t you notice at the time that there was so much blatant sexism around you, and when you did, talk back to the man-splainers.

There’s far more awareness of necessary equalities now. As importantly, we live at a time when identity politics are a given: though perhaps, too often, these have taken on the aura of victimhood, rather than agency. One thing I might say to young women now is be a little wary of imprisoning yourself within any single identity – life is bigger than that – and long.

Amy: Something I always think when I look back at pictures of young Amy is ‘give yourself a break’. I’m trying to now give myself that break in the present rather than in hindsight. I would hope my older self can be a part of feminism, politics and the identity of self without too much self-harassing!

Something I wish feminists from the past could know about feminism now is that irony, humour and seemingly flippant attitudes can be a sign of a powerful sense of self and feminism. I love the intricate feminism of ‘meme admins’ on Instagram but I fully understand that’s a difficult bundle of sarcasm and internet 2.0 for some to understand. But, it’s still valid.


If you could get all the world leaders together to agree to implement one policy to improve the lives of women – what would it be?

Amy: When I set you this question, Lisa, I didn’t think it would come back to me! It’s hard!

I think if I had to choose one thing it would end up being an amalgam of right to education and right to freedom from violence. It seems these two policies are interlinked by value: the value of a woman or non-gender-binary individual’s life.

Policy-wise I think we are in a dangerous place here in the UK with the cavalier attitude to council cuts meaning victims of domestic abuse are at risk not just from their abusers but a government policy that leaves them to fend for themselves. The work of Sisters Uncut is one example of a positive movement facing an extremely negative problem, as per your last question.

Lisa: Make sure there are women on all groupings deliberating the peace treaties that follow on wars – it’s been found that peace lasts longer if women have been part of this process. Instigate programmes where Aid money is given not through governments but directly into women’s hands.


Do you feel hopeful when you think about the future of the women’s movement?

Lisa: Very!

Amy: I feel positive about the movement, I don’t feel positive about the world surrounding the movement. The post-Brexit-vote increase in racist attacks, the cutting of aid to refugees in London, the treatment of the women at Yarl’s Wood . . . feminist values call you to action across so many aspects of politics.

The increase in understanding of a need for an intersectional feminism is, for me, part of a wider move to make sure feminism is relevant to all people and all injustices, stopping the movement from sticking itself into a monotone cul-de-sac.


Lisa Appignanesi was born in Poland and grew up in France and Canada. A novelist and writer, she is visiting professor of Literature and the Medical Humanities at King’s College London. She was chair of the Freud Museum from 2008-2014 and is a former president of English PEN. She was awarded an OBE for services to Literature in 2013. Her published work includes Mad, Bad and Sad, All About Love and Losing the Dead, and she co-edited Fifty Shades of Feminism. @LisaAppignanesi

Amy Annette started her career as a comedy producer in Edinburgh. Whilst working at Latitude she co-edited and contributed to I Call Myself A Feminist and with the book she has since been touring schools and literary festivals, including sell out shows at Bath Literary Festival, Bristol Festival of Ideas and Women of the World Southbank. @AmyAnnette_



Leave a Reply